I was just thinking about my lit paper. I think my paper one was pretty good, I'm actually rather proud of my pdd essay, as usual because of the man in the bowler hat. but in retrospect my paper two was really unfantastic. my tms essay, first of all it seems that everyone did tms, and secondly i didn't do a very good essay at all. there was no clear organisation, and i didn't have a lot of quotes and details from the text, and i think it was just a repititive, disorganised mishmosh of thoughts. and the lumber room bit, i don't completely remember what i wrote, but hopefully it was a lot better than the tms essay. i was wavering between tms and ooc for the essay, and decided on tms because it seemed more logical that it would be important for us in the 21st century and shit, but i guess the fact that i hate writing about that story and therefore didn't really study it very well, ended up in the essay being shit. i should have done ooc, it's much nicer and it would have been more different from everybody else.